Symantec Sucks: Item 2: Automatic LiveUpdate setting ignored

2007-10-04

Item 2: Automatic LiveUpdate setting ignored

Okay, look. I'm on dial-up. It's not my fault. There is no reasonable high-speed Internet option available in this neighbourhood. No DSL, no Cable TV, no WiMax.

I've got Norton Internet Security 2007. I just installed it on my home PC a couple of days ago. All up to date. I haven't done anything wrong.

Since my Internet pipe is so slow, I intentionally set Automatic LiveUpdate to OFF (note, 'OFF'). I'll Run LiveUpdate manually when I'm about to step away from the computer.

Off? Hello? Anyone listening?

Today I turn-on my PC, and connect to the Internet. A few minutes later I notice that my connection is really slow. I check and find that LiveUpdate is running in the background.

Can you see the problem here?

(Note: The above is a more-recent screen capture.)

I'd set it to OFF.

I hadn't asked it to run.

It was running.

It was plugging up my dial-up connection.

In spite of me explicitly setting it not to do so.

Sigh...

Honestly, I can see why people might go postal once in a while.

1 comment:

Adolf said...: Hi

Try using Wintask. You can set this program to block other programs from running

Good luck
Norbert; September 1, 2008 at 11:44 AM

Post a Comment

Symantec fanboy OkiNava wrote:

"For EVERY blog posting that SSBC posts there will be response from this blog."

In other words, he seemed to be very upset that I dared to criticize his favorite software company. So he promised the world that for "EVERY" post made here, he was going to post a rebuttal on his blog.

He posted three (3) rebuttals. Three.

That leaves about 125 rebuttals to go. LOL.

Perhaps he stumbled across some of the 'priceless' screen captures of blatent bugs and stupid errors and realized that there isn't really any rebuttal to that sort of documentary evidence.

OkiNava has another blog called "Norton Rocks". Almost rhymes with Northern Rock, a failed bank in the UK. Or perhaps he spelled "...Sucks" wrong.

Face facts. Norton Internet Security 2007 edition was indefensibly bad. There's nothing to argue about. NIS 2008 was not much better. One might as well try to claim that Cambodian dictator Pol Pot "was simply misunderstood."

For every action there is a reaction. Symantec screwed up big time with NIS 2007. This blog is a direct consequence of their terrible mistakes and incompetence.

Since they've never explicitly admitted that they sold horrible software and wasted the time of many people, then this blog will remain a semi-permanent record of their utter failings.

Legal notices

Trademark notice

"Symantec", "Norton", "Norton Internet Security" and similar terms are, or may be, registered trademarks (or servicemarks, or similar) owned by Symantec Corporation.

Other trademarks may be owned by others.

Use of these terms is nominative, fair and reasonable because that's the company and/or product to which I'm referring.

All trademarks are property of their respective owners and are being used without permission. The publication of the trademarks has not been authorized by, associated with or sponsored by the trademark owner.

Copyright "Fair Use / Fair Dealing" Notice

This blog will contain occasional small extracts and screen captures from computer program user interfaces, documents and related material that may be copyrighted by Symantec Corporation, or by other companies or organizations.

FAIR USE (FAIR DEALING) is claimed for purposes including but not limited to education, criticism, reporting and informed discussion of an important issue of concern to the public (the lack of quality of some commercial software products).

All copyrighted material used in this blog (webpage) is property of the respective owners and is being used without explicit permission. The publication of the extracts has not been authorized by, associated with or sponsored by the copyright owner.

Legal Demand Notices

All incoming legal notices will be published and widely disseminated.